THE BILL, MEASURE BY MEASURE

The bill, explained

The Firearms Amendment (Miscellaneous) Bill 2026 goes after the wrong people — licensed, law-abiding Tasmanian firearm owners — and asks a state that can't afford it to pay for the privilege. It changes the law in seven main ways: six aimed at police-checked owners and their working tools, sport and family collections, one aimed at criminals. Here's what each really means — whether you own a firearm or not.

Released 3 July 2026 Consultation draft — not yet law Submissions close 5pm Fri 7 August Read the official documents ↗
01

Reclassification of common rifles & shotguns

AFFECTS LICENSED OWNERS

WHAT IT SAYS

Straight-pull and button/lever-release centre-fire rifles and shotguns move from Categories A/B to Category C — a licence class limited mainly to primary producers and a small group of others. "Straight-pull" simply means you cycle the action by hand, pulling straight back — these are not self-loading (automatic or semi-automatic) firearms.

OUR VIEW

Overnight, firearms that thousands of police-checked Tasmanians lawfully bought for hunting, sport and pest control become off-limits to them. These are not the firearms driving crime in Tasmania — the criminals and illegal guns behind gun violence are untouched by this. You followed every rule — and you'd lose your property anyway.

02

Confiscation dressed up as a "buyback"

AFFECTS LICENSED OWNERS

WHAT IT SAYS

Owners who can't hold Category C would surrender reclassified firearms for compensation. The funding model is still being negotiated with the Australian Government — the bill's own documents confirm this.

OUR VIEW

The government wants owners to hand over lawful property for a scheme the state can't afford. Its own earlier figure for a broader buyback — around $20 million — sits on top of a $596.7 million deficit and net debt heading toward $10 billion, in a state that already spends more servicing debt than on police and fire. And taking registered guns off compliant owners does nothing to the illegal market — it makes no one safer.

03

Magazine capacity limits

AFFECTS LICENSED OWNERS

WHAT IT SAYS

New limits on detachable-magazine capacity for some Category A and B firearms. A magazine is the container that holds ammunition — many everyday hunting and sporting rifles use detachable ones.

OUR VIEW

This restricts equipment farmers and sport shooters already use lawfully every week — and does nothing about the illegal firearms behind actual crime. Lawful magazine ownership isn't what drives gun violence in Tasmania.

04

Citizenship & residency requirements

AFFECTS LICENSED OWNERS

WHAT IT SAYS

Australian citizenship and Tasmanian residency would become requirements for a firearms licence, with limited exemptions.

OUR VIEW

Permanent residents — people who live, work and farm here lawfully — already pass the same police checks as everyone else. Shutting them out does nothing for community safety; it just punishes people who've done everything right.

05

New lending, storage & notification rules

AFFECTS LICENSED OWNERS

WHAT IT SAYS

Changes to when firearms may be lent, where they must be stored, and new obligations to notify police of changes of details.

OUR VIEW

More administration for the people already following the rules. Some tidy-ups are sensible — but piling paperwork on compliant owners does nothing to the people who already ignore the law.

06

A national database of licensed owners

AFFECTS EVERY LICENSED OWNER

WHAT IT SAYS

Signs Tasmania up to the National Firearms Register — a Commonwealth-linked database tracking the firearms, licences and personal details of every law-abiding owner in near real time, plus new electronic dealer records.

OUR VIEW

We do not support this. It's a costly surveillance database of the very people who already obey the law — not criminals, who never register a thing. It builds a honeypot for hackers, and every dollar and hour spent on it is taken from policing the illegal guns that actually hurt people.

07

Tougher firearm-theft offences

✓ WE SUPPORT

WHAT IT SAYS

Stronger offences — including a three-month mandatory minimum sentence — for stealing a firearm or possessing a stolen one.

OUR VIEW

This is the only part of the bill worth keeping — it targets actual criminals and chokes the main source of illegal guns. It proves the government can aim at the right target. So why does the rest of the bill aim at you?

READ THIS BEFORE SOMEONE MISLEADS YOU

Ownership caps are NOT in this bill — yet

The government's consultation bill contains no numerical cap on how many firearms a licensed person may own. We won't tell you otherwise. But Labor has said it supports caps, and the Police Commissioner and gun-control groups have backed them — so a cap amendment is a live risk when the bill reaches Parliament. That's why your MPs need to hear from you now, not after the deal is done.

WHY CAPS ARE THE WRONG TARGET TOO

• Different jobs need different tools — a farmer may need separate firearms for browsing animals, feral pests and humane livestock work.

• Every one of those firearms is individually registered and known to police.

• A cap removes none of the illegal guns used in crime.

• TasFarmers and rural communities have publicly opposed arbitrary caps for exactly these reasons.

Our position in full

Shooters Union Australia backs one thing in this bill: tougher penalties for stealing or possessing a stolen firearm. That targets criminals. Everything else — reclassifying common firearms, a buyback, magazine limits, citizenship tests and a national database tracking law-abiding owners — punishes the people who already follow the law and leaves the illegal gun trade untouched. We already know it won't make the community safer. And it asks a state running a $596.7 million deficit, with net debt heading toward $10 billion, to borrow millions it doesn't have. Our ask is simple: don't proceed with the bill in its current form, stop targeting licensed owners, and put that money and police effort where the danger really is — illegal firearms, criminal networks and organised crime. We'll also oppose any arbitrary ownership cap. Submissions close 7 August, but this fight runs all the way to the vote in Parliament — and we intend to win it. Add your name, make a submission, and tell your MPs where you stand.

TAKE ACTION NOW →

STAND WITH US

Don't watch this one from the sidelines.

This Bill targets licensed, police-checked owners — not criminals. The single most powerful thing you can do takes 30 seconds: add your name to the petition to the Premier and the Minister for Police. Own a firearm or not — it's your money on the line, and your voice counts the same.

2386 Tasmanians have signed
the petition so far

Sign the petition

Thirty seconds. No firearm licence needed. Every name goes to the Premier and the Police Minister — never published without your consent.

Signing unlocks step 2 — emailing the seven MPs who represent you.